Volume 33, Issue 3 (6-2025)
JSSU 2025, 33(3): 8850-8859 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.SSU.DENTISTRY.REC.1401.058
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohsen Barzegar M, Soltanianzadeh M, Yektaie M A, Aghily H. Investigating the Effect of ORA-AID Mucosal Adhesive on the Patient's Pain Level after Tooth Extraction. JSSU 2025; 33 (3) :8850-8859
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-6265-en.html
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-6265-en.html
Abstract: (57 Views)
Introduction: ORA-AID adhesive is recognized as an effective dressing for dental sockets in adults, yet its effectiveness in adolescents has not been explored. This study compared ORA-AID with conventional dressings in the patients younger than 18.
Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted involving 29 patients. On one side, a tooth was extracted and dressed using a standard method. After two weeks, the tooth on the other opposite side was extracted, and the ORA-AID adhesive was utilized. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 5, 12, 24, and 48 hours following the extraction. Repeated Measures ANOVA was employed for comparisons between the two methods.
Results: Pain was significantly lower with ORA-AID, except for the first 5 hours (p=0.669), and remained and remained so for up to 48 hours after extraction (all p<0.001). Increased pain levels were observed in older patients (24 and 48 hours) as well as in individuals with greater dental plaque (5 and 12 hours). The highest decrease in pain with ORA-AID in comparison to conventional dressing was observed at 24 hours after extraction.
Conclusion: ORA-AID significantly reduces post-extraction pain when compared to conventional dressings, except for the initial 5 hours. Therefore, ORA-AID may reserve as an appropriate alternative for routine dental dressings in adolescents.
Methods: A double-blind clinical trial was conducted involving 29 patients. On one side, a tooth was extracted and dressed using a standard method. After two weeks, the tooth on the other opposite side was extracted, and the ORA-AID adhesive was utilized. Patients reported their pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 5, 12, 24, and 48 hours following the extraction. Repeated Measures ANOVA was employed for comparisons between the two methods.
Results: Pain was significantly lower with ORA-AID, except for the first 5 hours (p=0.669), and remained and remained so for up to 48 hours after extraction (all p<0.001). Increased pain levels were observed in older patients (24 and 48 hours) as well as in individuals with greater dental plaque (5 and 12 hours). The highest decrease in pain with ORA-AID in comparison to conventional dressing was observed at 24 hours after extraction.
Conclusion: ORA-AID significantly reduces post-extraction pain when compared to conventional dressings, except for the initial 5 hours. Therefore, ORA-AID may reserve as an appropriate alternative for routine dental dressings in adolescents.
Keywords: ORA-AID Dressing, Oral Wound Dressing, Tooth Extraction, Post-Extraction Pain, Mucoadhesive Dressing, Adolescents, Clinical Trial, Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Type of Study: clinical trial |
Subject:
Dental
Received: 2024/08/24 | Accepted: 2024/12/9 | Published: 2025/06/5
Received: 2024/08/24 | Accepted: 2024/12/9 | Published: 2025/06/5
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
