Diagnostic Value of Senior Dental Students in Yazd About of  Detection the Proximal Caries on Panoramic Radiographs  Compared to Detection of Experts in 1394

Romoozi, E; Daneshkazemi, AR; Tavana, N

Volume 24, Issue 5 (Aug 2016) JSSU 2016, 24(5): 421-428 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Romoozi E, Daneshkazemi A, Tavana N. Diagnostic Value of Senior Dental Students in Yazd About of Detection the Proximal Caries on Panoramic Radiographs Compared to Detection of Experts in 1394. JSSU 2016; 24 (5) :421-428
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-3719-en.html

Diagnostic Value of Senior Dental Students in Yazd About of Detection the Proximal Caries on Panoramic Radiographs Compared to Detection of Experts in 1394

E Romoozi

, AR Daneshkazemi

, N Tavana ^*

Abstract: (5804 Views)

Introduction: Tooth decay is the most common chronic disease of man in the world and dentists should receive the capability to accurately diagnose of tooth decay during the training courses. In addition to clinical examination, the panoramic view and intraoral radiography is usually used for the caries detection. Therefore, the detection of caries on X-ray images can have a role in treatment planning.

Methods: In this analytical study, 10 panoramic radiographies that randomly selected, separately given to 30 senior dental students and 2 professors (in order to determine the gold standard). Data were analyzed using SPSS 17 software, diagnostic tables and indexes were prepared and the results were analyzed by Kappa test. Moreover, in order to determine the agreement between the professors and students about the depth of the decay the weighted kappa coefficient was used.

Results: The kappa value about detection of presence or absence of proximal caries between professors and students's diagnosis was 0.428 (P value=0.001). Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value obtained by students in caries detection were %47, %91.9, %63 and %85.3, respectively. Coefficient of agreement in detection of depth diagnosis obtained by professors and students was 0.361(p value=0.000).

Conclusion: The diagnostic capability of senior dental students about caries detection was fair and depth diagnosis was slight.

Keywords: Caries, Interproximal Caries, Panoramic Radiography, Caries Detection, Diagnostic Value

Full-Text [PDF 494 kb] (1522 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Dental
Received: 2016/05/9 | Accepted: 2016/10/3 | Published: 2016/10/3

References

1. Cawson RA, Odell EW. Cawson's essential of oral pathology and oral medicine 7th Ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone 2002; 2: 36-57.

2. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th Ed. StLouis: The C.V. Mosby Co 2012; 3: 69-75.

3. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 6th ed. Louis, Missouri: Mosby 2009; 17.

4. Nikneshan S, Mashhadi FM, Sabbagh S. Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26(1): 5-10.

5. Kamburoglu K, Kolsuz E, Murat S, Yuksel S, Ozen T. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radio 2012; 41(6): 450-59.

6. Mehdizadeh M, Savar H. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of filtered digital Panoramic radiographs in detecting interproximal caries. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2013; 8(7): 629-36.

7. Goodarzipour D, Nejat S, Fotouhi A. Accuracy of digital panoramic in detection of interproximal caries. J Dent Med-Tehran Univ Med Sci 2011; 24(1): 36-41. [Persian]

8. GoodarziPour D, Bashizade H, Talaeipour AR, NajafiMotlagh A. Evaluation of the accordance of panoramic radiography ordering in maxillofacial radiology department, school of dentistry, Tehran university of medical sciences with FDA guidelines in scholar year 2005-2006. JDM 2007; 20(3): 220-26.

9. Whaites E. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology 4th edition. 2007; chapter 11. Pp. 125-33.

10. Nikneshan S, Moradi AH, Mohseni S, Moshfeghi M. Capability of senior dental students in detecting the presence anddiagnosing the depth of proximal caries on a bitewing radiographs. J Dent Sch 2012; 30(2): 110-16.

11. Scarfe WC, Langlais RP, Nummikoski P, Dove SB, Mc David WD, Deahl ST, et al. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bitewing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral patho 1994; 77(2): 195-207.

12. Maupomé G, Sheiham A. Decisions on diagnosis and management of approximal caries by final-yeardental students. Dentomaxillofac Radio 1997; 26(2): 107-11.

13. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2nd edition1981. New York: John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-26370-2.

14. Mileman PA, van den Hout WB. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in theradiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31(1): 7-14.

15. Shirani F, Zamani Naser A, Mosavat F, Hamzeh M. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of dental caries among senior dental students. Special Material Techniques Dent 1390; 7(5): 712-14.

16. 16- Akbari M, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZH, Movagharipour F. Assessing the Performance of the Laser Fluorescence Technique in Detecting Proximal Caries Cavities. J Mash Dent Sch 2013; 37(3): 195-204.