Showing 2 results for Sobhani
K Ghandehari, F Behdani, Z Izadi Mood, M Davarri Edalatpanah, S Asaadi, E Kiadarbandsari, Mm Amjadi, Mr Sobhani,
Volume 23, Issue 6 (Aug-Sep 2015)
Abstract
Introduction:Determining the effect of stress on strock in benficial. If there is a relationship between them, using public education can lead to decrease the risk of stroke. This study investigate the effect of stress on cerebrovascular accident.
Methods: This study was a prospective case-control, which was performed on the patients with stroke referred to nerve clinical Ghaem Hospital, and the control group were selected among the staff of the university with no history of stroke during winter 2015. The persian translation of questionnaire of Holmes and Rahe stress scale related to the last month was completed among all of the participants in both groups. Diagnosis of stroke and determination of its etiology was made by neurologist.
Results: By considering the frequency of serve stress, 361 patients with stroke were investigated and from these 190 patients were in the control group. The relative frequency of stress and stroke and intracerebral homorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage were meaningful(p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.006). There was no significant relationship between the relative frequency of serve stress among the patients with ischemic stroke, cryptogenic infraction, and cardioembolic with atherosclerotic and the control group
(p=0.637, p=0.311, p=0.439, p=0.109,). There were a significant relationship between serve stress and atherosclerotic stroke(p=0.026). While, high stress score was significantly more frequent in atherothrombotic subtype of brain infarction than controls, p=0.046.
Conclusion: There was a meaningful relationship between stress as an important risk factor in the patients with hemorrhagic stroke and atherothrombotic brain infarction. Based on this research stress could be considered as a risk factor of stroke.
Mohammad Reza Sobhani, Seyed Mohammad Jalil Abrisham, Hamed Jahanbakhti, Hamid Pahlavanhossein, Shahram Shokraneh,
Volume 26, Issue 4 (Jun 2018)
Abstract
Introdution: Nowadays, the use of internal fixation in the field of orthopedics is increasing. On the other hand, there is no clear criteria at hand on removal of orthopedic implants, and there is disagreement among orthopedic surgeons on the necessity of routine removal of orthopedic implants in all patients after the healing of the fracture, and many surgeons take a personal approach towards the issue. Therefore, this study was conducted with the purpose of examining the result of hardware removal in patients admitted to Yazd’s Shahid Sadoughi Hospital.
Methods: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional one, in which the patients were examined based on some factors, including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, location of the fracture and the mechanism of injury, degree of satisfaction, degree of activity, degree of pain, the reason for removal of the implant and the quality of life, using the SF-36 questionnaire.
Results The mean quality of life score in the patients before the surgery was 81.41. After the surgery the score reached to the number of 87.23 (P-value = 0.0001), which was a significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients after the removal of the implant. In addition, the findings showed a significant reduction in pain after the surgery (p-value=0/0001).
Conclusion: Noting that there is a disagreement on the subject of routine removal of orthopedic implants, the results of this study showed that most patients desired the removal of the implant. based on the improvement of pain score and quality of life score after the surgery, by considering the side effects, removal of the implant seems beneficial and leads to improved the quality of life, increased pain and an improve in patient daily activity and performance.
