Volume 25, Number 4 (July 2017)                   JSSU 2017, 25(4): 252-263 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Abstract:   (491 Views)

Introduction

Genetics is a broad issue which is associated with diversity and inheritance in all the living beings. Numerous researches have been implemented in this sphere. Meanwhile, significant steps have been taken during the past few years including identification of active research fields of the area as well as recognition of scientific literature in the sphere. This study, therefore, seeks to identify core and frequently-taken subjects as well as newly-emerged or emerging subjects in the area.  

Methodology

The current research has focused on researches on thematic evolutions in the genetics area with a scientometric approach. As many as 79,593 articles on genetics on PubMed were analyzed over the base period (1909-2004) using Premap, Excel, and SPSS, while the figures are 40,184 and 97,512 for the five-year period (2005-2009) and ten-year period (2005-2014), respectively.

Findings

The findings revealed that growth rate for the number of articles on genetics has demonstrated an upward trend while genomics, proteomics, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and pharmacogenetics have been the most active research fields in the area. Moreover, based on inclusion index, it has been demonstrated that evolution has been abundantly seen and new subjects were born in the genetics area on a daily basis.

Conclusion

It is a complicated process to discover conceptual relationships between the documents of a scientific area. Hence, the resulting conclusions naturally require a deep understanding. Quantitative approaches, despite having shortcomings and being unable to comprehensively analyze different aspects of the issue, are not entirely futile and inaccurate. But they can enable the policymakers to acquire a general knowledge of the current situation so that they can make more realistic decisions and operate more efficiently. Continuance of such researches, aimed at assessing a discipline, will eventually empower the managers in those disciplines and scientific areas

Full-Text [PDF 717 kb]   (222 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: other
Received: 2017/01/14 | Accepted: 2017/04/9 | Published: 2017/08/20

References
1. Mirmohammadi meybodi A, Mirlohi A. Genetics, history and branches, Library archives and copies Studies. The Mah book Science and Technology 2010; 134: 3-5. [Persian]
2. Makkizadeh F, Hazeri A, Keikhaee F. The Study of Thematic Structure of Documents related to the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 in PubMed from 2005-2014. Modiriat Salamat 2016; 19(64): 43-55. [Persian]
3. Dana M. Check semantic relationships among topics covered in Persian scientific evidence in the field of global warming. Master of Science thesis surveys, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University 2015. [Persian]
4. Mokhtari M, Tavakolizadeh-Ravari M, Zalzadeh E, Baghbanian M. Predicting Basic Concepts of a Field, Based on the Factors of Oldness and Frequency Use of Subject Terms: A Case Study on Colon Cancer. Iranian J of Health Information Management 2016; 13(5): 354-359. [Persian]
5. Makkizadeh F, Hazeri A, Hosininasab SH, Soheili F. Thematic Analysis and Scientific Mapping of Papers related to Depression Therapy in PubMed. Modiriat Salamat 2016; 19(65): 51-63. [Persian]
6. Zare Farashbandi F, Hovsepyan O, Askari G. Content analysis of cancer related nutritional information in Popular Iranian magazines. Payesh 2014; 14(1): 121- 130. [Persian]
7. Lee PC, Su HN. Quantitative mapping of scientific research-the case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Tech forecasting and social change 2010; 78(1): 132-151.
8. Zhi W, Ji G. Constructed wetlands, 1991- 2011: a review of research development, current trends, and future directions. Sci Total Environ 2012; 441: 19-27.
9. Chen C, Hu Z, Liu S, Tseng H. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2012; 12(5): 593-608.
10. Krampen G, Von Eye A, Schui G. Forecasting trends of development of psychology from a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics 2011; 87(3): 687-694.
11. Small, H, Boyack, Kevin W, Klavans, R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Res Policy 2014; 43(8): 1450-1467.
12. Ravikumar S, Agrahari A, Singh SN. Mapping the intellectual structure of Scientometrics: a coword analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scientometrics 2015; 102(1): 929-955.
13. Qin J. Semantic similarities between a keyword database and acontrolled vocabulary database: An investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature. J of the American Soc for Inf Sci 2000; 51(2): 166-180.
14. Price, D.J.D. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press 1963; 314-316.
15. Tavakolizadeh Ravari M, Makkizadeh F, Abedi Khorasgani Z, Soheili F. Study co-authorship process and its relationship with Persian journal impact factor in the field of Iranian technical and engineering during the years 1380- 1389. Acad Librarianship and Inf Res 2015; 48(4): 583-603. [Persian]
16. Asadi M, saghafi S. A Study of co-authorship among the Iranian researchers in the field of engineering during 1990-2010. Iranian J of Eng Edu 2012; 14(55): 111-134. [Persian]
17. Papi Z, Nooshinfard F. Iranian researchers in the field of toxicology co-authorship of scientific information base from 1991 to 2011. Institute of Health Information Management 2014; 11 (1): 49-59. [Persian]
18. Dolani A, Haji-Mohammedan M, Rashidi A, Nazari H, Khosroshahi S, MotazakkerM. Production of Urmia University of Medical Sciences based databases WOS, SCOPUS and PUB MED. Urmia Med J 2012; 23 (5): 531-538. [Persian]
19. Mokhtari M, Moradi M. Most articles published ISI nanotechnology Persia who limitations? Nanotechnology 2010; 9 (6): 10-16. [Persian]
20. Makkizadeh F, Hosaininasab SH, Zalzadeh E, Hazeri A. The Thematic Structure of Papers on Depression Treatment in PubMed from 2005 to 2014. Health In Manage 2016; 13(5): 347-53.
21. Hou, Q, Mao G, Zhao L, Du H. Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2015; 20: 541-555.
22. Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, Elzanowski A, Johansson Ulf S. Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biology Letters 2006; 2: 543-547.
23. Palzkill T. Proteomics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002: 211-230.
24. Samaj J, Thelen J. Plant proteomics. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2007:128-139.
25. Haghdoost A. Understanding the molecular epidemiology. J of Kerman Med Sci 2005; 15(1): 511-514. [Persian]
26. Dehbozorgi M. Gene polymorphisms CYP2C19*3 in the ethnics iranians. Master's Thesis Biology Genetics. School of Life Sciences. University of Sistan and Baluchestan 2013. [Persian]
27. Wathiqzadeh Ansari H. Pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenetics. Retrieved on 2016. [Persian]