Volume 26, Issue 1 (Apr 2018)
JSSU 2018, 26(1): 77-84 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aminian A, Mousavi fard B, Shahsavari pour M. The prevalence of Bolton discrepancy and associated malocclusion in patients attending the orthodontics department of Kerman Dental School and private clinics: 2012-2015. JSSU 2018; 26 (1) :77-84
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-4321-en.html
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-4321-en.html
Abstract: (5469 Views)
Introdution: For the proper occlusal interdigitation or coordination of arches in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment with proper overjet and overbite, there must be a proper mesiodistal tooth size ratio between maxillary and mandibular teeth. The Bolton analysis should be taken into consideration while diagnosing, treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Bolton discrepancy in the patients attending to Orthodontics Department of Kerman Dental School and private clinics to determine the effects of gender and unilateral maxillary canine impaction on Bolton ratio.
Methods: This cross sectional study was performed on 311 pretreatment orthodontic casts of patients attending to Orthodontics Department of Kerman Dental School and private clinics between 2012- 2015. The greatest mesiodistal dimensions of teeth were measured with digital caliper with accuracy of 0.01 mm. Independent t-test and chi square were applied to analyze the data by SPSS 18 software and values were considered to be significant when P<0.05.
Results: The mean anterior and overall Bolton’s ratios were 78.49% and 91.73%, respectively without considering malocclusion and gender. The most prevalent anterior and overall Bolton ratios were 41.5% and 25.7%, respectively. The anterior and overall Bolton ratios for female patients were greater than male patients. There were no significant relationship between canine impaction and Bolton’s ratios.
Conclusion This study indicated a noticeable prevalence of tooth- size discrepancies in the patients. Regarding tooth- size discrepancies and their effects on occlusion and dental relations, it is suggested that Bolton’s tooth size analysis must be performed before starting the orthodontic treatment
Methods: This cross sectional study was performed on 311 pretreatment orthodontic casts of patients attending to Orthodontics Department of Kerman Dental School and private clinics between 2012- 2015. The greatest mesiodistal dimensions of teeth were measured with digital caliper with accuracy of 0.01 mm. Independent t-test and chi square were applied to analyze the data by SPSS 18 software and values were considered to be significant when P<0.05.
Results: The mean anterior and overall Bolton’s ratios were 78.49% and 91.73%, respectively without considering malocclusion and gender. The most prevalent anterior and overall Bolton ratios were 41.5% and 25.7%, respectively. The anterior and overall Bolton ratios for female patients were greater than male patients. There were no significant relationship between canine impaction and Bolton’s ratios.
Conclusion This study indicated a noticeable prevalence of tooth- size discrepancies in the patients. Regarding tooth- size discrepancies and their effects on occlusion and dental relations, it is suggested that Bolton’s tooth size analysis must be performed before starting the orthodontic treatment
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Dental
Received: 2017/09/11 | Accepted: 2017/11/25 | Published: 2018/05/20
Received: 2017/09/11 | Accepted: 2017/11/25 | Published: 2018/05/20
References
1. Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton tooth size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(5): 327-34.
2. 2- Bolton A. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28(3): 113-30.
3. 3- Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: "Does Bolton’s analysis apply?”. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117(2):169-74.
4. 4- Bernabe E, Major PW, Flores Mir C. Tooth width ratio discrepancies in the sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125(3): 361- 5.
5. 5- Eslamian L, Ghadirian H, Seifi M. Prevalence of tooth size discrepancies (Bolton analysis) in sagittal malocclusions. J Dent Sch GYEAR 2005; 22(4): 547-56. [Persian]
6. 6- Trehan M, Agarwal S, Sharma S. Applicability of Bolton analysis: A study on Jaipur population. Int J Clin pediatr dent 2012; 5(2): 113-17.
7. 7- Tayyab M, Zakir S, Hussain U, Jehan R, Nasrullah Z. Bolton discrepancy among different classes of malocclusion in Peshawar population. Pak Oral Dental J 2014; 34(4): 647-50.
8. 8- Freeman JE, Maskeroni AJ, Lorton L. Frequency of Bolton tooth size discrepancy among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1996; 110(1): 24- 7.
9. 9- Karimi M. Evaluation of dental anomalies panoramic radiographs of patients referring to oral and maxillofacial radiograph centers in Kerman. [Doctorate Thesis]. Iran. Dental School of Kerman University of Medical Sciences; 2016. [Persian]
10. 10- Graber L, Vanarsdall R, Vig K. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences 2011: 149.
11. 11- Hunter WS, Priest WR, Memili B. Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. Journal of Dental Res 1960; 39(2): 405-14.
12. 12- Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA. Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy and Malocclusion: Is There a Relation? Angle Orthod 2005; 75(2): 208–13.
13. Paulino V, Paredes V, Gandia JL. Prediction of arch length based on intercanine width. European J Ortho 2008; 30: 295–98.
14. 14- Othman SA. Harradine NWT: Tooth size discrepancy and Bolton‘s ratios: a literature review. J Orthod 2006; 33: 45-51.
15. Mclaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Treisi HJ. Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. 1st ed. St Louis. Sydney Toronto: The C.V Mosby Co 2001: 71-85.
16. Crosby DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 457-61.
17. Ravanmehr H. Evaluation of crown mesiodistal diameter of permanent teeth. jdm 1994; 7(1) :5-16. [persian]
18. Fahad FH. sulaimani A, Afify AR. Bolton analysis in different classes of malocclusion in TSaudi Arabian sample. Egypt Dent J 2006; 52(2): 1119-25.
19. Kachoei M, Ahangar-Atashi MH, Pourkhamneh S. Bolton’s intermaxillary tooth size ratios among Iranian schoolchildren. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011; 16 (4): 568-72.
20. Batool I, Abbas A, Rizvi SAA, Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008; 20(4): 51-4.
21. Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Dentofacial Orthop 1972; 6(1)1: 29-37.
22. Nie Q, Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(5): 539-44.
23. Ta TA, Ling JY, Hagg U. Tooth size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children .Am J Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120(5): 556-8.
24. Roeinpeikar SMM, Salehi P, Emami Z, Davari M, ZarifNajafi H. Evaluation of Simple Method to Predict the Anterior and Overall Bolton Discrepancy in a South Iranian Population. J Mash Dent Sch 2010; 34(3): 209-18. [Persian]
25. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Dentofacial Orthop 1962; 48(7): 504-29.
26. Nourallah AW, Splieth CH, Schwahn C, Khurdaji M. Standardizing interarch tooth-size harmony in a Syrian population. Angle Orthod 2005; 75(6): 996-99.
27. Mirzakouchaki B, Shahrbaf S, Talebiyan R. Determining tooth size ratio in an Iranian-Azari population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(7): 86-93. [Persion]
29. Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Oka K, Shimooka S. Tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions in a Japanese orthodontic population. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(6): 994-99.
30. Ricci ID, Scavnavini MA, Kaieda A, Rosario HA, Paranhos LR. Bolton’s ratio in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Braz J Oral Sci 2013; 12(4): 357-61.
31. Santno M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 303-7.
32. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu-Alhaija ESJ. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(3): 459-65.
33. Thilander B, Jakobsson SO. Local factors in impaction of maxillary canines. Acta Odontol Scand 1968; 26(1-2): 145-68.
34. Al-Nimri K, Adwan I, Gharaibeh T, Hazza'a AM. Tooth size discrepancies in female patients with palatally impacted canines. Australian Orthodontic J 2008; 24(2): 129-33
35. Stanaitytė R, Smailienė D, Kaduševičius I. Tooth size discrepancies and dental arch in patients with palatally and labially impacted maxillary canines. Biomedicine 2014; 24(2): 69-74.
36. Atoche JRH, Agüayo MDR, Ramírez ME, Ayala FJA, Ávila BAC, Peraza MER. Impacted Maxillary Canine Prevalence and Its Association with Other Dental Anomalies in a Mexican Population. International Journal of Dentistry 2017; 20(17): 1-4
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
