Volume 24, Issue 6 (sep 2016)                   JSSU 2016, 24(6): 513-523 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

NasrAbadi T, Sharafi S, FallahTafti B, Vaezi A, Heidari M. Investigating the effect of continuous care model on social health status of family caregivers in hospitalized patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JSSU. 2016; 24 (6) :513-523
URL: http://jssu.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-3602-en.html
Abstract:   (6594 Views)

Introduction: Chronic patient care causes  some problems, including pressure or burden of care, reducing the time for routine activities and self care, also causes compatibility decline in deal with stress and disorders of physical and mental health, emotional, social and financial prosperity of caregivers. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continuous care model on social health status of  family caregivers in patients  underwent coronary artery bypass surgeries.

Methods: This study was  one-group clinical trial research, the samples consisted 48 family caregiver of  the patients  underwent coronary artery bypass graft  surgeries, who  were selected using purposive sampling method. Data collection tools included the standard questionnaire Data collection tool was Novak and Guest caring burden inventory (CBI) s as well as demographic questionnaire, which  was  measured at the baseline and 8 weeks after intervention.  Data were analyzed using  descriptive  and analytic statistic (paired t-test, and covariance analysis) with SPSS version 16.

Results: The mean score of  caring burden realated  to  the social health status before intervention was 3.86±6.11 and after intervention was 1.81±2.33. In examining five dimensions burden of care,  continuous care model had an impact on all aspects of the  caring burden and it led to the reduction of the burden of care  in  all aspects.  So,  it had a significant decrease  in the social health status (p <0.01).

Conclusion: Implementation of continuous care model as the intervention of cheaper and available,  can be an effective step inreducing the burden of care of the  patients with  coronary artery disease in health status of social.

Full-Text [PDF 806 kb]   (2285 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2016/02/1 | Accepted: 2016/06/5 | Published: 2016/10/5

1. 1- de la Salud Mental FM. Mental Health and chronic physical illnesses–the need for continued and integrated care, 2010. Woodbridge: WORLD Federation for Mental Health, 2010; 7(3): p.127.
2. 2- Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. Global strategy for 2- the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respirat Critic Care Med 2012.
3. 3- Organization WH. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship: World Health Organization; 2013.
4. 4- Hosseiny R, Bastani F, Sayahi S, Momen AH, Alijanpoor AM. The effect of educational-counseling program on general health of women as caregivers of patient, with Alzheimerdisease. 2011: 83-93.
5. 5- Prasad AS. Essential and Toxic Element: 5- Trace Elements in Human Health and Disease. Elsevier; 2013.
6. 6- Sadeghi Sherme M, Razmjooei N, Ebadi A, Najafi Mehri S, Asadi-Lari M, Bozorgzad P. Effect of applying continuous care model on quality of life of patients after coronary artery bypass graft. J Critic Care Nurs 2009; 2(1): 1-6.
7. 7- Moieni M, Poorpooneh Z, Pahlavanzadeh S. Investigating the effect of family-focused nursing intervention on caregiver burden of the family members of the patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery in Isfahan Shahid Chamran Hospital during 2012. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014; 19(2):187.
8. 8- Garza JJ, Gantt DS, Van Cleave H, Riggs MW, Dehmer GJ. Hospital disposition and long-term follow-up of patients aged≥ 80 years undergoing coronaryartery revascularization. Am J Cardio 2003; 92(5): 590-2
9. 9- Mitnick S, Leffler C, Hood VL, American College of Physicians Ethics P, Committee HR. Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships. J General Internal Med 2010; 25(3): 255-60.
10. 10- Abbasi A, Asayesh H, Rahmani H, Shariati A, Hosseini S. Rouhi Gh. The Burden on Cargivers from Hemodialysis Patients and Related Factors. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2011; 8(1): 26-33.
11. 11- Telfer DJ, Sharpley R. Tourism and development in the developing world: Routledge; 2015.
12. 12- Hoshino J, Hori Y, Kondo T, Tamakoshi K, Toyoshima H, Sakakibara H. Characteristics of hypertension related factors in female home caregivers in Japan comparison with general community non-caregivers. J Clinic Nurs 2013; 22(3-4): 466-78.
13. 13- Myaskovsky L, Posluszny DM, Schulz R, DiMartini AF, Switzer GE, Dabbs AD, et al. Predictors and Outcomes of Health-Related Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cardiothoracic Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 2012; 12(12): 3387-97.
14. 14- Karlsson A-K. Open heart surgery and its consequences for well-being-the perspectives of patients, relatives and health care professionals: Inst of Medicine. Dept of Public Health and Community Medicine; 2008; 23.
15. 15- Ahmadi, Fazllolah. Effect of continuous care model on quality of life of hemodialysis patients. J Iran Med Sci2006; (53): 123-134
16. 16- Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update. Circulation 2014; 129(3).
17. 17- Ghavami H, Ahmadi F, Meamarian R, Entezami H, Faghih Zadeh S. Effectiveness of applying continuous care model on diabetic patients body mass index and weight. Horizon Med Sci 2006; 12(2): 10-6
18. 18- Sadeghi SM, Alavi ZF, Ahmadi FE, Karimi ZA, Babatabar DH, Ebadi A, et al. Effect of applying continuous care model on quality of life in heart failure patients 2009: 9-13.
19. 19- Khodaveisi M, Ashtarani F, Mohammadi N, Mahjub H, Mazdeh M. The effect of continuous care on quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients. Sci J Hamadan Nurs amp; Midwifery Faculty 2014; 22(2): 64-73.
20. 20- Novak M, Guest C. Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. The gerontologist. 1989; 29(6): 798-803.
21. 21- Theobald K, McMurray A. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: discharge planning for successful recovery. J adv nurs 2004; 47(5): 483-91.
22. 22- Holland DE, Mistiaen P, Bowles KH. Problems and unmet needs of patients discharged home to self-care. Professional Case Management. 2011; 16(5): 240-50.
23. 23- Watanabe A, Fukuda M, Suzuki M, Kawaguchi T, Habata T, Akutsu T, et al. Factors decreasing caregiver burden to allow patients with cerebrovascular disease to continue in long-term home care. J of Stroke Cerebrovascular Diseases 2015; 24(2): 424-30.
24. 24- Harrison MB, Browne GB, Roberts J, Tugwell P, Gafni A, Graham ID. Quality of life of individuals with heart failure: a randomized trial of the effectiveness of two models of hospital-to-home transition. Med Care 2002; 40(4): 271-82
25. 25- Azimi R, Mohammadi F, Mohammadi H, Farzi M. The effect of home-based stroke rehabilitation on quality of life of stroke survivors and their family caregiver’s of strain. J Evidence-Based Care 2014; 3(1): 77-85.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | SSU_Journals

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb